30 Years Controversies have been associated with Prithvi. In the early stages of his acting career, he played the role of ntr in a film meant to make fun of the tdp leader of the time. party men were at that time after him. With his role in Khadgam, he eventually rose to fame. Only then did prithviraj change into 30 Years Prithvi. At the time, there were rumours that he played a role that resembled Balakrishna, which were obviously not well embraced.
He eventually joined the ycp and was given a respectable post in the svbc after a good career in movies. He engaged in some dishonourable behaviour that damaged the reputation of that position. The party high command was forced to remove him from his position because of the incident. He was demoted, and eventually the party forces also managed to keep him at bay. He has been subject to an unofficial ban in the film industry as well because, while living under YCP's shadow, he spoke out against numerous film celebrities.
The ycp no longer takes him or the film business into consideration. So, in an effort to get political support, he is desperate enough to grab the media and the legs of some lawmakers. He ought to be aware of one thing. His services might not be required by the political parties or the film industry. He is not accepted by both fields for this reason. Posani krishna Murali, who is renowned for his incisive tongue and willingness to criticise pawan kalyan and others, is someone he ought to have emulated. He never engages in political opportunism and always calls a spade a spade.
He eventually joined the ycp and was given a respectable post in the svbc after a good career in movies. He engaged in some dishonourable behaviour that damaged the reputation of that position. The party high command was forced to remove him from his position because of the incident. He was demoted, and eventually the party forces also managed to keep him at bay. He has been subject to an unofficial ban in the film industry as well because, while living under YCP's shadow, he spoke out against numerous film celebrities.
The ycp no longer takes him or the film business into consideration. So, in an effort to get political support, he is desperate enough to grab the media and the legs of some lawmakers. He ought to be aware of one thing. His services might not be required by the political parties or the film industry. He is not accepted by both fields for this reason. Posani krishna Murali, who is renowned for his incisive tongue and willingness to criticise pawan kalyan and others, is someone he ought to have emulated. He never engages in political opportunism and always calls a spade a spade.