Politics' ugly side is on display with the discussion over Gorantla Madhav's nude video. First off, no one has been harmed by that video. Naturally, Gorantla has been vehemently denying that it is his video. It has also been established that certain parties with vested interests distributed a fictitious forensic report in this case. Even if it is assumed to be factual, it will still remain personal information after all this. If this is the case, the people who leaked the private footage to the public should have been the criminals.
That is definitely a bigger offence. According to current indian law, every sexual conduct that occurs between two consenting individuals is acceptable. In today's environment, the moral justifications are not need to be considered. Politicians should only be expected to perform their assigned tasks; nothing more.
Gorantla has now issued Chandrababu a challenge that is truly valid. He requested permission from Chandrababu to swear under oath at the kanipakam Vinayaka temple that he is not connected to the vote for note case. Chandrababu was, in fact, exonerated in that case a long time ago. But in that regard, is he faultless? How many people do not think Chandrababu's voice can be heard on the call related to the case?
Gorantla retorted that if Chandrababu accepts this oath, he is prepared to retire as an MP. Yet, is he prepared? In addition, Gorantla added that the person in the video is not him and that he will not take the oath there. Chandrababu responds to this difficulty in the same manner as any other day. TDP's bullet didn't really affect YSRCP in any way overall. Instead, it backfired, and this problem will soon be hidden.
That is definitely a bigger offence. According to current indian law, every sexual conduct that occurs between two consenting individuals is acceptable. In today's environment, the moral justifications are not need to be considered. Politicians should only be expected to perform their assigned tasks; nothing more.
Gorantla has now issued Chandrababu a challenge that is truly valid. He requested permission from Chandrababu to swear under oath at the kanipakam Vinayaka temple that he is not connected to the vote for note case. Chandrababu was, in fact, exonerated in that case a long time ago. But in that regard, is he faultless? How many people do not think Chandrababu's voice can be heard on the call related to the case?
Gorantla retorted that if Chandrababu accepts this oath, he is prepared to retire as an MP. Yet, is he prepared? In addition, Gorantla added that the person in the video is not him and that he will not take the oath there. Chandrababu responds to this difficulty in the same manner as any other day. TDP's bullet didn't really affect YSRCP in any way overall. Instead, it backfired, and this problem will soon be hidden.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel