After it was passed in december 2019, the citizenship amendment act (CAA) has generated discussion and controversy. Opponents claim that the Act has several shortcomings despite its goal of granting citizenship to marginalized groups from nearby nations. Let's explore these issues.
 
• Not all neighbors or members of religious minorities are covered by the CAA. Critics contend that Article 14 of the indian Constitution, which ensures equality before the law for both natives and foreigners, is violated by the Act's discriminatory character. The preamble of the indian Constitution includes the idea of secularism, which is likewise challenged by this selective approach.
 
• Areas covered by the indian Constitution's Sixth Schedule are not covered by the Act. These autonomous, tribal-dominated territories are found in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram. States like Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, and Mizoram that have inner-line permission regimes are also not included in the Act. These areas are sparsely inhabited and home to a sizable indigenous population. Critics worry that newcomers of any faith might upend the voting patterns and cultural norms of the area.
 
• For the administration, separating unlawful migrants from those who are being persecuted is a big problem. Opponents of the Act contend that because it lacks a strong system for separating these two categories, it might be abused.
 
• The bilateral ties between india and its neighbors may be strained as a result of the CAA. Opponents contend that the Act subtly charges these nations of persecuting religious minorities, which would strain relations between them.
 
For more interesting updates wa click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel

Find out more:

SIBY JEYYA

11/03/2024 06:46 PM