Despite conflicting reviews, Prabhas' kalki 2898 AD, which was directed by Nag Ashwin, was a box office success. Although Kamal Haasan's depiction as supreme Yaskin had an effect, there were higher hopes. According to the producers, he will play a bigger part in the second installment.
 
It was recently disclosed by storyboard artist Venugopal that kamal haasan was first considered for the villainous role. But in case Kamal declined to work on the movie, mohanlal was taken into consideration by the filmmakers as a fallback. This begs the intriguing question: Could mohanlal have outperformed kamal haasan in his performance?

Given his vast expertise and adaptability, Kamal Haasan's portrayal of supreme Yaskin gave the story of the movie a little more nuance. It is anticipated that the second portion will showcase his talent for portraying nuanced, complicated personalities. However, mohanlal is also a well-known actor who is renowned for his potent performances. His approach to the part may have given the character a distinct, although no less fascinating, interpretation.
 
Although it's hard to say precisely how mohanlal might have moulded the part, his stellar resume makes him seem like a strong contender. Although kamal haasan has a considerable edge in terms of his reach across India, both actors are outstanding. His reputation is highly respected, especially in Hindi-speaking areas and states like Maharashtra, which increases the movie's effect and audience. In North indian tier-2 and tier-3 cities, mohanlal isn't particularly well-liked. Although opinions on who may have performed better are still up for dispute, Kamal Haasan's celebrity certainly helped the movie succeed as a whole.
 
 
For more interesting updates wa click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel

Find out more:

G GOWTHAM

06/08/2024 11:10 AM