The announcement of naga chaitanya and Sobhita Dhulipala's engagement has caused a flurry of celebrity hysteria and ignited the internet. The couple, who had been the focus of dating rumors for some time, formally announced their relationship on august 8th in hyderabad with a customary ceremony. When telugu actor Nagarjuna, Chaitanya's father, revealed the news, it went viral very fast and sparked a wave of responses from both the media and fans.
 
Venu Swamy, a tamil astrologer, made a daring—and some might say reckless—prediction on the future of the recently engaged pair on Instagram. In his opinion, the relationship between chaitanya and Sobhita is bound to collapse in 2027 due to the purported participation of an enigmatic third lady. The public took offense at this provocative remark, which incited fan indignation and drew scathing condemnation for its insensitivity.
 
When the telugu Film Journalist Association (TFJA) intervened and expressed grave offense at Swamy's comments, the issue became more heated. In addition to criticizing the astrologer, the TFJA reportedly filed a police complaint against him, according to a report from 123 Telugu. The association deemed Swamy's video to be hurtful and improper, particularly in light of the shaky nature of the engagement news. They made it quite evident that the entertainment business is not the place for such speculative and derogatory remarks, especially when it comes to personal life.

In a follow-up video, venu Swamy attempted to backpedal after sensing the heat. He asserted that his prognosis regarding chaitanya and Sobhita was only a continuation of one he had made previously regarding Chaitanya's prior relationship with samantha Ruth Prabhu. After reassuring his audience that he had talked with MAA President Manchu Vishnu, Swamy pledged to refrain from speculating on the destinies of politicians and movie stars. It will be interesting to see if this promise holds up, but for the time being, Swamy is the target of intense media attention.
 
 

Find out more: