The recent incident involving YouTuber Irfan cutting his wife’s umbilical cord and broadcasting it on his channel has stirred up controversy in tamil Nadu. This act, which many perceived as unprofessional and intrusive, sparked widespread public backlash. Critics argue that such a private medical procedure should have been handled solely by trained professionals, not by an unqualified individual in a hospital setting, much less documented for public viewing. netizens are fuming that supporting DMK can erase all crimes and the below posts are some of the examples.

Despite facing earlier warnings for conducting a gender reveal in a hospital setting—something restricted by indian law to prevent gender-based discrimination—this latest incident has escalated concerns regarding the boundaries of responsible content creation on social media.

Tamil Nadu health Minister Ma Subramaniam quickly responded to public outrage by promising strict action, but instead of penalizing Irfan directly, the authorities took disciplinary measures against the hospital and the doctor who allowed the incident. While the hospital and medical professionals involved are expected to adhere to strict ethical guidelines, many citizens feel that Irfan himself should also bear responsibility for using a sensitive medical moment as content. Even a murder case was registered earlier and he escaped from it.

This reaction reflects broader public concerns about accountability, especially when content creators push ethical boundaries to attract more views. In Irfan’s case, his lack of remorse and his continued content production only intensified criticism, leaving many questioning the fairness of the response and why he has not faced direct consequences.

The incident has fueled suspicions that Irfan’s political associations might afford him certain privileges, sparing him from repercussions. Allegations that he has avoided punishment because of ties with the ruling DMK party reflect a common perception of favoritism that some claim allows individuals with political connections to evade accountability.

This perception has amplified existing frustration and mistrust, with critics arguing that such instances weaken the rule of law and public trust in authorities. Whether true or not, this impression underscores the need for impartial accountability, especially when public figures blur the lines between private experiences and social media content.
For more interesting updates wa click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel

Find out more:

Irfan's View

SIBY JEYYA

26/10/2024 01:45 AM