Both incidents—a Khalistani attack on a Hindu temple in Brampton, canada, and an attack by Sanghi extremists on a mosque in Bhagalpur, Bihar—underscore the deep-seated dangers of communal violence and the double standards that often arise in the portrayal and justification of such acts. While any form of religiously motivated aggression should unequivocally be condemned, reactions often reveal a troubling inconsistency.

Attacks on temples by extremist factions are frequently branded as acts of “terrorism,” while attacks on mosques by other groups are sometimes reframed as expressions of “awakening” or assertions of power. This selective framing fuels divisiveness and perpetuates stereotypes, fostering a cycle of misunderstanding, fear, and resentment between communities.

In a globalized world, where religious communities exist side by side in increasingly diverse societies, the impact of communal violence is far-reaching. The Brampton incident has left the Hindu community in canada feeling vulnerable, challenging the country’s values of multicultural acceptance and religious tolerance. Similarly, attacks on mosques in India, such as the one in Bhagalpur, damage the secular fabric of the nation and create an atmosphere of fear and alienation among Muslim citizens.

Both incidents highlight the importance of viewing communal violence as a societal issue rather than selectively justifying or condemning based on religious affiliation. Extremist actions against any religious site should be seen as threats to peace and stability, harming not just those directly affected but the entire community.
For more interesting updates wa click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel

Find out more:

Hindus

SIBY JEYYA

05/11/2024 11:08 AM