The debate over whether india should return to paper ballots for voting has gained traction in light of concerns surrounding the security and transparency of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). While the U.S. is geographically larger than india, its elections—often conducted through paper ballots—allow for vote counting to begin on the same day, with results often available quickly.
India's reliance on EVMs, however, brings its own set of challenges, particularly as vote counting usually takes place about a month after elections conclude. Critics argue that the delay, combined with concerns over potential tampering or hacking, raises questions about the credibility of EVMs. Proponents of paper ballots claim that a manual system would enhance transparency and boost public trust in the electoral process.
One of the main arguments against EVMs is the perception that they can be tampered with or hacked, potentially compromising election results. Although the election commission of india (ECI) asserts that EVMs are safe and secure, some political parties and activists have raised doubts, suggesting that EVMs might not be as foolproof as claimed. They argue that paper ballots would reduce the risk of manipulation, as they provide a tangible record that can be verified and recounted if necessary.
In contrast, EVMs store votes electronically, which may lead to greater distrust among voters who are unable to physically see their votes recorded. For a democratic process to be effective, citizens need to feel confident in its fairness and transparency, and paper ballots might offer that assurance by providing a more visible and verifiable process.
India's reliance on EVMs, however, brings its own set of challenges, particularly as vote counting usually takes place about a month after elections conclude. Critics argue that the delay, combined with concerns over potential tampering or hacking, raises questions about the credibility of EVMs. Proponents of paper ballots claim that a manual system would enhance transparency and boost public trust in the electoral process.
One of the main arguments against EVMs is the perception that they can be tampered with or hacked, potentially compromising election results. Although the election commission of india (ECI) asserts that EVMs are safe and secure, some political parties and activists have raised doubts, suggesting that EVMs might not be as foolproof as claimed. They argue that paper ballots would reduce the risk of manipulation, as they provide a tangible record that can be verified and recounted if necessary.
In contrast, EVMs store votes electronically, which may lead to greater distrust among voters who are unable to physically see their votes recorded. For a democratic process to be effective, citizens need to feel confident in its fairness and transparency, and paper ballots might offer that assurance by providing a more visible and verifiable process.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel