A man recently accused prime minister Narendra Modi of promoting soft porn through the film Sabarmati Report, sparking a contentious controversy. ekta kapoor produced the movie, which has generated a lot of criticism. Kapoor was even punished under the POCSO Act for allegedly improper material, and her platform, ALTBalaji, has come under fire for showing what some people view as soft porn.
When the Sabarmati Report—which was linked to Kapoor's divisive platform—was presented in the indian Parliament, things became more heated. The public strongly criticized this action, with many raising concerns about the government's involvement in endorsing inappropriate content. Outrage ensued on social media, with many accusing the BJP-led administration of supporting such content.
Critics contend that the government was tacitly supporting dubious material by permitting a movie made by a person with a bad reputation to be shown in Parliament. This led to a wider discussion on the kinds of content that may be used to represent india nationally.
Arnab Goswami, a well-known bjp government publicist, added to the uproar by being remarkably silent on the subject. The lack of his customary outspoken support for government initiatives fueled public conjecture about the administration's position on the matter. Many people are accusing the bjp leadership of disregarding moral issues for business or political advantage, and the public's ire is growing. Many people are calling for more responsibility as a result of the incident, which has sparked conversations about content control and the moral guidance of those in authority.
When the Sabarmati Report—which was linked to Kapoor's divisive platform—was presented in the indian Parliament, things became more heated. The public strongly criticized this action, with many raising concerns about the government's involvement in endorsing inappropriate content. Outrage ensued on social media, with many accusing the BJP-led administration of supporting such content.
Critics contend that the government was tacitly supporting dubious material by permitting a movie made by a person with a bad reputation to be shown in Parliament. This led to a wider discussion on the kinds of content that may be used to represent india nationally.
Arnab Goswami, a well-known bjp government publicist, added to the uproar by being remarkably silent on the subject. The lack of his customary outspoken support for government initiatives fueled public conjecture about the administration's position on the matter. Many people are accusing the bjp leadership of disregarding moral issues for business or political advantage, and the public's ire is growing. Many people are calling for more responsibility as a result of the incident, which has sparked conversations about content control and the moral guidance of those in authority.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel