In recent years, the world has faced multiple public health challenges, with Covid-19 and Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) being two of the most prominent. While both diseases have caused global concern, their modes of transmission differ significantly, leading to variations in their potential impact and spread.


Covid-19 Transmission: The Airborne Threat

Covid-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is primarily an airborne disease. The virus spreads through respiratory droplets and aerosols expelled when an infected person talks, coughs, sneezes, or breathes. These tiny particles can linger in the air, especially in enclosed spaces with poor ventilation, making it easy for the virus to infect others who are nearby or even across the room. This airborne transmission has made Covid-19 highly contagious, leading to rapid global spread and necessitating widespread lockdowns, social distancing, and mask mandates to curb the outbreak.


The invisibility of the virus in the air and the potential for asymptomatic carriers to unknowingly spread the disease further exacerbated its impact. people could contract Covid-19 from simply being in the same room as an infected person, even if they were not in close contact, which made it incredibly challenging to control without stringent public health measures.


Mpox Transmission: Close Contact and Visibility

In contrast, Mpox is not airborne and has a different mode of transmission. The Mpox virus spreads primarily through close, skin-to-skin contact with an infected person. This can occur during physical contact, such as touching blisters or rashes caused by the virus, or through contact with contaminated objects like clothes, bedding, or towels.


 Additionally, Mpox can be transmitted through respiratory droplets, but this typically requires prolonged face-to-face interaction, such as talking closely with an infected person.

The nature of Mpox transmission means that it is less likely to spread rapidly and widely in the same way Covid-19 did. It requires direct physical contact or close proximity, which generally limits its spread to close contacts of an infected person rather than entire communities. The visible symptoms of Mpox, such as the characteristic rash and blisters, also make it easier to identify and isolate cases quickly, further reducing the risk of widespread transmission.


Pandemic Potential: Why Mpox is Less Likely to Be Widespread

The difference in transmission methods is a key reason why Mpox is considered less likely to become a pandemic on the scale of Covid-19. Covid-19’s airborne nature meant that even casual, brief encounters could result in transmission, leading to large outbreaks in a short period. In contrast, Mpox’s reliance on close contact for transmission makes it easier to contain through targeted public health measures, such as isolating infected individuals and tracing close contacts.


Additionally, the visible symptoms of Mpox provide clear indicators of infection, allowing for quicker diagnosis and response. In the case of Covid-19, many individuals were infectious even before showing symptoms, which contributed to its rapid and stealthy spread.



While both Mpox and Covid-19 have posed significant health challenges, their modes of transmission are fundamentally different. Covid-19’s airborne nature made it a global threat that spread with alarming speed, while Mpox’s requirement for close contact limits its potential for widespread outbreaks. Understanding these differences is crucial for tailoring public health responses and ensuring that appropriate measures are taken to prevent and control future outbreaks.

Find out more: