Of course, everybody can agree that criticisms will exist in a community, and constructive comments always aids those who are subjected to it in learning new things. However, trolling criticism serves to fuel the cruel egos of bystanders who simply want to laugh at the pitiful (or unpleasant) position of others. After seeing how "Son Of India" and vishnu Manchu are being ridiculed right now, this debate resurfaced.


Yet after vishnu Manchu filed legal notifications to a few YouTube channels for expressing personal remarks, we're seeing latest youtube clips on the video-sharing website criticising vishnu and his upcoming production company. If they keep to the movie's topic, the critics on the wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW'>digital effects and substance of Son Of india are legal, but creating 'Jabardasth'-style comments on the movie and its creator recalls us of the samantha situation.



Samantha was recently mercilessly harassed for leaving naga Chaitanya, prompting the star actress to go to court to challenge these so-called YouTube video creators. vishnu is now in the same boat, as he is dealing with all of the vicious insults on social networks and preparing to battle them legally. Perhaps trolls should learn what it takes to develop a film, no matter how bad it is, and restrict their criticism to the content rather than assaulting the thought pattern of the creators. Otherwise, in this liberal world, we will not be encouraging any positive environment.

Find out more: