The fact that the protagonist is the late chief minister's son is never made clear in the first film. Only the main character's "silence" serves to hint to it. This perspective has allowed for suspense in the narrative. It is stated right away in "Godfather" that chiranjeevi is the late Chief Minister's son. As a result, the drama around "Lucifer's" or "Brahma's" identity is lost. The arrival of the younger son of the chief minister is then highly dramatic in "Lucifer." The part in "Godfather" is lopsidedly reduced.

What "Godfather" does well is maintain the original's spirit. The narration of the first half is riveting. Additionally, other scenes like giving chiranjeevi a heroine or songs are not included. This is quite gratifying. There is no additional political track that was imposed upon the tale; Chiranjeevi's political discussions fit very well with it. The scenes and puri Jagannadh's portrayal of a journalist have both turned out well. A few scenes of the movie continue to follow the story even after the intermission. But after that, it completely transformed into a "Telugu commercial film."

Vivek Oberoi's character is more malevolent than Atya Dev's. satya Dev, who is known as the boss of the bosses, appears humble in comparison to Chiranjeevi. Additionally, when chiranjeevi and salman khan appear together, there are no exhilarating moments. The same scenes that were filmed on mohanlal and prithviraj Sukumar in the original provide shivers. Despite this, "Godfather" is a superior action drama to more current masala films. When something stays true to the original, it succeeds greatly; when it veers off course, it fails.
For more interesting updates wa click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel

Find out more:

godfather

G GOWTHAM

08/10/2022 12:39 PM