Is naga chaitanya planning to be married in same place?

Ever since the couple announced their engagement on august 8, there has been talk about naga chaitanya and Sobhita Dhulipala's wedding. According to current rumors, they are hoping to wed in rajasthan in 2025. naga has now responded to the commotion, stating that no decisions have been made yet. Speaking with the media during the event, Naga—who earlier this week debuted a bridal collection for a new apparel brand—discussed her aspirations for marriage. He expressed his gratitude for entering this new stage of life.

The silence is broken by naga Chaitanya.

While at the event, naga was questioned if this was a rehearsal for his upcoming wedding to Sobhita. "Perhaps you could think so, that it's a countdown kind of for my marriage," he said. He was also asked if he wanted an elaborate indian wedding or a simple, private event. In expressing his thoughts, the actor said, "Marriage is about the people who mean a lot to me." That's how I want my marriage to be; it doesn't have to be a big, showy event, but it should be based on individuals respecting their respective cultures and traditions.

More probing was done of the actor on the time and location of his wedding to Sobhita. To set the record straight, naga said that no decisions have been made yet and that he will provide more information shortly.

Regarding the pair, on august 8th, Sobhita and Chay got engaged. Sobhita and Chay never addressed their equation—which had been the subject of persistent rumors—until the official announcement of their engagement surfaced. father of Chay, seasoned actor naga chaitanya, welcomed Sobhita into the family and wished them well on their journey together on august 8 by posting pictures from their private engagement ceremony on social media. Rumors of a romance between the actor couple began in the summer of 2022. After that, there were a few sightings of the two together, but they always made it a point to avoid talking about their romantic relationship. 


Find out more: