Harvey Mason Jr., CEO of the Recording Academy, recently sparked significant discussion when he announced that the Grammy Awards would begin accepting music created with the help of artificial intelligence (AI). This announcement initially led to confusion, prompting Mason to clarify that while AI can be used in the creative process, only humans can submit work for Grammy consideration. He emphasized that this approach aims to continue celebrating human creativity at the highest level, even as the role of AI in music evolves.

The rise of AI in the arts, including music, has raised many questions and concerns. Musicians and industry professionals are grappling with the potential impacts on copyright, royalties, and the value of human artistry. Some artists are anxious and fearful, worried that AI might undermine their hard-earned craft, while others are optimistic about the new opportunities AI could bring. For instance, some musicians are taking legal action to stop unauthorized AI-generated deepfakes of their work, while others are willing to embrace AI versions of themselves, provided they receive proper compensation.

Musician Devante expressed strong opposition to AI's role in music, arguing that it threatens the authenticity and essence of what it means to be an artist. On the other hand, another musician who also works in the tech industry suggested that AI's impact on music could be similar to the industrial revolution's impact on employment—potentially creating new opportunities rather than eliminating them.

Mason noted that AI is already being used in music production, particularly in mastering and equalizing sounds. The industry's primary concerns now are ensuring proper approvals for using an artist's work, distinguishing human contributions from AI-generated ones, and ensuring fair compensation for all parties involved. Establishing these protections across the music industry is seen as crucial as AI's influence continues to grow.

Find out more: