shilpa shetty and raj Kundra have got a big relief from the bombay High Court. In fact, the court has stayed the notice of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to the actress and her husband raj to vacate the house and farm house. The couple had earlier challenged the notice to vacate their house-farm house related to the money laundering case in the court.

ED had sent eviction notice to shilpa and Raj

Let us tell you that on september 27, ED had sent a notice to shilpa shetty and her husband raj Kundra in the investigation related to money laundering that they have to vacate their house and farm house in pune within 10 days. In such a situation, the couple has got a lot of relief after the bombay high court put a stay on the ED notice. On the other hand, the ED also told the court on thursday that no action will be taken on the notice sent to shilpa shetty until a decision is taken on the petition filed by the ED against the attachment of the couple's property.

What did shilpa Shetty's lawyer say?

In a statement shared by shilpa shetty and raj Kundra's lawyer Prashant Patil, he denied the connection with the Ponzi scheme. The statement said, "First of all, let us clear the fake media reports stating that raj Kundra and his wife shilpa shetty Kundra are involved in the cryptocurrency Ponzi scam. This is also not the case of the Enforcement Directorate. It is stated that Mr. Kundra and Mrs. Shetty have no connection with the alleged Ponzi scam, which dates back to 2017.

The statement mentions that the court has ordered a stay on the eviction notice. Shetty and Kundra will appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in Delhi. It also said that the couple will continue to cooperate with the ED until the matter is resolved. It further said, “An eviction notice was issued by the ED against my clients' residential properties, which has been stayed by the Hon'ble high court, thereby providing time to Mr. raj Kundra and Mrs. shilpa shetty to file an appeal before the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal for further relief. Delhi. It is the duty of my clients to continue to cooperate with the investigation of the Enforcement Directorate.”