Kejriwal's conditional release may or may not have any effect..?

Arvind kejriwal got bail. He should have got it. Because, while granting bail to manish Sisodia recently, the supreme court once again made it clear that bail is the rule, sending to jail or keeping in custody is an exception, and should be an exception. This observation of the court was very important, because the way the money laundering rules were made strict, experts had unanimously said that due to strict rules, it would now be easy to keep anyone in jail for a long time. However, the supreme court once again proved through its observations and decisions (like bail) that the Natural Justice Theory is still strong in this country. The basic spirit of the law of our country is that even if a hundred criminals escape, not even a single innocent should be punished. The supreme court has granted bail to kejriwal, calling bail a necessary condition of justice.

Two petitions, two verdicts

Anyway, Kejriwal had filed two petitions in the court. One for bail and the other to declare the arrest by cbi illegal. The court granted bail, but did not consider the arrest by cbi illegal. However, one of the two judges definitely wrote in his verdict that what was the need for cbi to arrest him or cbi should not do such a thing again that it is called a caged parrot. Justice Bhuiya and Justice Suryakant unanimously granted bail on this issue but both gave different opinions on the petition challenging the arrest and still rejected the petition challenging Kejriwal's arrest. In this, Justice Bhuiya said that the arrest was not needed, yet the arrest was justified. If both the judges had not together declared this arrest (by CBI) correct, then this case would have again gone to a bench of more than two judges and it is possible that it would have gone further. That is, the question is that when the judge questioned the working of the cbi, how did he prove the arrest to be correct by his decision instead of rejecting it. Although, this is a matter of judicial interpretation and only legal experts will interpret the entire decision, but prima facie this question does arise.