harris, as Vice President and with her background in foreign policy, is seen as someone who understands the importance of NATO and the transatlantic relationship. This contrasts with Trump’s more erratic and sometimes confrontational stance toward the alliance during his presidency.
Here’s a breakdown of why NATO might prefer Harris:
Consistent Support for NATO: Unlike trump, who frequently questioned NATO’s relevance and even suggested that the U.S. might withdraw from the alliance, harris is expected to uphold NATO's importance as a cornerstone of global security. This would reassure european allies who were rattled by Trump’s unpredictable statements and threats to reduce U.S. involvement in NATO.
Commitment to Shared Security Goals: harris, as Vice President, was already deeply involved in discussions around NATO’s role in global security, particularly in response to challenges like Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. Experts believe she would continue to work closely with european allies on joint military strategies and political solutions, continuing support for ukraine and confronting Russian expansionism.
Pressure on european Defense Spending: While harris is seen as a more traditional and stable supporter of NATO, she is also expected to maintain pressure on european countries to meet the defense spending target of 2% of GDP, just like trump did. The difference would likely be in her diplomatic approach to achieving this goal, relying on negotiation and coalition-building rather than blunt threats.
Geopolitical Stability: Harris’ diplomatic experience and less confrontational approach are seen as a return to a more stable, predictable American foreign policy that NATO allies prefer, especially after Trump’s "America First" policies, which often left european leaders uncertain about U.S. commitments to the alliance.
In summary, while NATO doesn't “favor” any particular political leader, it’s likely that european leaders and officials within NATO would find Harris’ approach to transatlantic security more reassuring and conducive to long-term stability than the volatile dynamics that characterized Trump’s presidency.