The andhra pradesh High Court’s recent decision to quash a poll code violation case against tollywood star allu arjun has stirred considerable public interest and political debate. Filed in connection with the 2024 assembly elections, the case originated from a complaint by a local official who alleged that Arjun’s visit to the home of his friend and then-YSR congress MLA candidate, Silpa Ravi, violated election protocol. This complaint was based on the actor’s failure to seek prior permission from the Returning Officer, as required under the election Code during campaign season.
Arjun’s visit on May 11, just before the final day of campaigning, quickly attracted a crowd of his fans outside the former MLA’s residence. The gathering raised concerns under Section 144 of the election Code and Section 31 of the andhra pradesh police Act, which were in force to prevent large assemblies and maintain public order. This led the local Two Town police to register a case against both arjun and the congress PARTY' target='_blank' title='ysr congress-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW'>ysr congress candidate.
In response, the election commission of india (ECI) took swift action, holding district officials responsible for their handling of the incident. The ECI mandated charges against Nandyal district SP Raghuveer reddy, initiating a departmental inquiry that involved reddy and two others.
Allu Arjun’s legal defense argued that his visit was purely personal, unrelated to election campaigning, and thus did not constitute a violation of the poll code. On october 25, the high court granted interim relief, instructing that no legal action be taken until november 6. Now, with the court’s decision to dismiss the charges, the case has sparked broader questions about election laws and the boundaries between personal and public influence in high-stakes campaigns.
This development highlights the delicate balance between electoral law enforcement and individual rights, particularly in high-profile cases involving public figures. With Arjun’s case now dismissed, it raises critical questions on political influence, celebrity involvement in campaigns, and the responsibilities of law enforcement in enforcing campaign-related regulations.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel