As a humanitarian, it is deeply troubling to witness such a drastic and sudden decision to eliminate over 90 percent of foreign aid contracts, especially when millions of lives depend on this assistance. Humanitarian aid is often a lifeline for vulnerable populations, and these cuts will have devastating consequences for the most fragile countries.

Aid programs provide essential services like healthcare, food assistance, education, and disaster relief. In many parts of the world, especially in developing countries, these programs are not just a convenience; they are necessary for survival. Forcing the closure of these vital services can mean the difference between life and death for people who are already suffering from poverty, disease, and conflict.

The justification of “convenience” and “the interests of the US government” seems to ignore the human impact and the international obligations that come with being a global leader. It’s difficult to reconcile these cuts with the ethical principles of compassion and solidarity that should guide foreign aid. Instead of serving the interests of the US government, foreign aid should be about serving the needs of the most vulnerable populations, regardless of political or strategic considerations.

In fragile nations, especially those recovering from conflict or facing natural disasters, the sudden withdrawal of assistance can destabilize entire societies. people already struggling with inadequate healthcare or insufficient food supplies now face even graver risks. This decision fails to acknowledge the interconnectedness of global well-being; when one country suffers, the effects ripple outwards, potentially destabilizing entire regions.

While there may be arguments made for reassessing foreign aid or ensuring better accountability, such drastic cuts without sufficient consideration for their long-term consequences feel both unfair and deeply misguided. Humanitarian efforts should prioritize the well-being of individuals, particularly those in the most vulnerable situations. The needs of millions should not be sacrificed for short-term political or financial considerations.

Find out more: