A U.S. judge just ruled that Trump's decision to fire the head of a watchdog agency was illegal—because, of course, it was. The ruling specifically protects the office of Special Counsel, which is responsible for safeguarding whistleblowers—aka the people who expose corruption, incompetence, and wrongdoing in government. So naturally, trump wanted them gone.
Despite his whole "drain the swamp" shtick, he had a habit of firing anyone who tried to keep the government honest. His strategy? If someone holds him accountable, just get rid of them. But this time, a judge wasn’t having it. The ruling makes it clear that the law doesn't allow the president to fire the watchdog at will. Who knew? (Spoiler: Everyone except Trump.
Of course, the Justice Department, now under Biden, has filed an appeal, likely to clarify the broader implications of the ruling. But for now, it's another legal smackdown for Trump—adding to his ever-growing list of courtroom losses.
A president is supposed to understand—or at least consult experts about—the legal consequences of their decisions. The job isn’t a free-for-all where you just do whatever you feel like and hope for the best. That’s why presidents have legal advisors, the Justice Department, and, you know, the Constitution to guide them.
In Trump’s case, he often acted impulsively, ignoring legal boundaries or assuming he could just bulldoze through them. This ruling is another example of that backfiring—because laws exist for a reason, and even presidents don’t get to rewrite them on a whim.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel