In a move that has sent shockwaves through Washington, former President donald trump fired two Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Tuesday, potentially setting up a major legal battle over the independence of regulatory agencies.
The Firings and the Fallout
The white house abruptly removed FTC commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, both Democrats, in a decision that has drawn immediate pushback. Slaughter, in a strongly worded statement, called the firings “illegal”, arguing that they violate both federal law and supreme court precedent.
“Today the president illegally fired me from my position as a federal trade commissioner, violating the plain language of a statute and clear supreme court precedent,” Slaughter said. “Why? Because I have a voice. And he is afraid of what I’ll tell the American people.”
Her statement underscores the broader concern that the trump administration is seeking to consolidate power over independent regulatory agencies—a move that could have far-reaching implications.
Legal Precedent at Stake
At the heart of this controversy is a 1935 supreme court ruling (Humphrey’s Executor v. United States), which established that FTC commissioners cannot be removed by the president without “good cause”. By dismissing Slaughter and Bedoya, trump is directly challenging this long-standing precedent, likely triggering legal battles over presidential authority and agency independence.
The FTC, founded in 1914, is designed to operate independently, enforcing consumer protection and antitrust laws without direct political interference. If Trump’s firings are upheld in court, it could set a new precedent, giving presidents greater power to shape regulatory bodies by removing commissioners at will.
A Strategic Power Play?
Trump and his allies have long been critical of independent regulatory agencies, arguing that they wield too much power without sufficient accountability. The FTC has been particularly aggressive in recent years, cracking down on major corporations over antitrust concerns—a stance that some conservatives see as overreach.
This latest move suggests that trump is doubling down on his effort to reshape the federal bureaucracy, a key theme of his political playbook. But legal experts warn that overturning a nearly 90-year-old supreme court precedent won’t be easy.
What Happens Next?
With lawsuits almost certainly on the horizon, the fate of the FTC—and the broader landscape of independent agencies—could be decided in the courts. If Trump’s firings are upheld, it could fundamentally alter the balance of power between the executive branch and regulatory commissions.
For now, the battle lines are drawn. Is this a necessary move to rein in unaccountable bureaucrats, or a dangerous overreach of executive power? The courts—and history—will decide.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel