Narendra Modi’s repeated use of “Didi O Didi” to address mamata banerjee during political rallies was widely criticized as condescending and sexist. While political banter is expected, the tone and delivery of this phrase came across as mocking rather than respectful, reducing a sitting Chief Minister’s stature to that of a subject of ridicule.
This remark did not just target Banerjee politically but also carried an undertone that many perceived as dismissive toward women in leadership. In a country where women still struggle to be seen as equals in politics, such rhetoric only reinforces gender-based belittlement. Instead of engaging in substantive debate on policies and governance, the phrase became a symbol of the personal attacks that often define indian election campaigns.
Curiously, despite the clear distaste expressed by many, there was no significant outrage from institutional bodies like the election Commission, which has often cracked down on other politicians for lesser offenses. This selective tolerance raises questions about the uneven application of electoral ethics.
Modi’s choice of words may have played well with his political base, but it undoubtedly set a poor precedent for the tone of political discourse in India. Rather than elevating the debate, such jibes only serve to trivialize important democratic exchanges, replacing them with theatrics designed to provoke rather than inform.
The BJP's reaction to Kunal Ghosh's remarks exposes the party’s selective sensitivity in political discourse. When narendra modi mocked mamata banerjee with the “Didi O Didi” jibe, the bjp dismissed concerns of sexism and disrespect, branding it as mere election rhetoric. However, when Kunal Ghosh, a TMC leader, made controversial remarks about Modi’s family, the bjp suddenly took offense, demanding respect for personal matters.
This glaring double standard raises an important question: Is mockery acceptable only when it serves BJP’s political interests? When Modi makes personal jibes, it is celebrated as political wit, but when a rival hits back, it becomes a moral issue.
The BJP's outrage over Ghosh’s comments seems less about genuine concern and more about political optics—trying to frame themselves as victims while having no qualms about using similar, if not harsher, tactics. This episode is yet another reminder that in indian politics, moral posturing is often just a weapon wielded when convenient.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel