Rahul Dravid to lead rajasthan team..!? Sangakkara to continue..!?

 The team management has officially announced that rahul dravid has been signed as the head coach of the rajasthan team. Apart from that, Sangakkara will continue as the director of the rajasthan team, the management of the team said that they will lead the rajasthan team together. rajasthan won the first series of IPL in 2008. Since then, rajasthan has failed to win the IPL even once. Despite advancing to the finals in 2022, they lost to Gujarat. Qualifier 2 lost last season too.
As a result, it was said that the rajasthan team management is trying to bring in an indian coach. Accordingly, the bcci contract with rahul dravid, who won the t20 world cup, ended. As a result, rajasthan tried to sign rahul dravid as coach. rahul dravid has already worked with the rajasthan team from 2013 to 2015. However, rahul dravid has not taken any decision for the past few months. In this situation, rajasthan team management went to his house and held talks. Finally, the agreement was decided and signed in Bangalore itself. Following this, the CEO of the rajasthan Royals team, Jack Lush McCrum, welcomed rahul dravid by giving him the jersey of the team. Talking about this, rahul dravid said that after the success of the t20 world cup series, I think this is the right time to take up the next challenge. He said that the rajasthan Royals team is the right place to face that challenge. This raised the question of whether Sangakkara had been sacked as the coach of the rajasthan team. The rajasthan team has given an indirect explanation for this. That means rahul dravid has only been signed as the head coach of the rajasthan Royals team. Sangakkara will therefore continue as the Royals' team director. Thus the rajasthan team will be jointly led by rahul dravid and Sangakkara. Sangakkara will also lead teams including barbados Royals and Pearl Royals. Fans have been saying that the rajasthan team management has not reduced Sangakkara's respect in any way.

Find out more: