A recent controversy arose when a Muslim chess player declined to shake hands with Vaishali, a female opponent, citing religious reasons. While respecting religious beliefs is important, the issue here is not the refusal itself but the manner in which it was done. A simple act of courtesy—such as a verbal greeting or a gesture to convey respect—could have prevented the situation from escalating. The lack of grace and decorum in declining the handshake was glaring, leaving many questioning whether this behavior aligns with the principles of sportsmanship..jpg)
Moreover, this was not the first instance of such behavior. The inconsistency in the player's conduct—shaking hands with other female players in the past but refusing in this instance—raises eyebrows. This selective approach comes across as both arbitrary and hypocritical, undermining the credibility of the religious justification provided.
The Double Standards of "Haram"
What makes the situation even more ironic is the player's participation in activities that could also be considered haram under Islamic law. Chess itself has been a subject of debate among Islamic scholars, with some labeling it as impermissible due to its association with gambling and time-wasting. Despite this, the player seems unbothered by these concerns while actively competing at the highest levels of the game.
Furthermore, the player likely uses technology—such as phones and operating systems—developed in regions or by entities they might ideologically oppose. For example, the phone in their pocket may have been manufactured in China, a country accused of detaining Uyghur Muslims. The operating system could be American-designed, with companies run by individuals perceived as adversaries to Muslim interests in places like Gaza. This blatant contradiction only deepens the perception of hypocrisy.
Ego in Chess: A Growing Problem
Chess players are often celebrated for their intellect, but incidents like these reveal a darker side to the game—a growing sense of ego and entitlement among some players. It's disappointing to see this behavior not just in declining handshakes but also in the lack of accountability and self-awareness when their actions are criticized. Compared to footballers and cricketers, who face public scrutiny for their every move, some chess players seem to operate in a bubble where they feel untouchable.
The Bigger Picture
Sports are meant to bring people together, transcending barriers of religion, gender, and nationality. When players allow personal beliefs or biases to interfere with the fundamental values of respect and camaraderie, it tarnishes the spirit of competition. Refusing a handshake may seem like a small act, but its implications are far-reaching. It sends a message—intended or not—that some participants view themselves as above the unwritten rules of sportsmanship.
Respect for cultural and religious beliefs is a two-way street. While others may respect a player's right to uphold their faith, the player must also show respect for their opponents and the game itself. A little courtesy and consistency go a long way in maintaining the dignity of the sport. If players continue to prioritize personal biases over sportsmanship, governing bodies like FIDE may need to step in to set clearer guidelines.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel