pooja Hegde’s portrayal of Rukmini in the movie Retro earned critical acclaim for her performance, with audiences praising the depth and sensitivity she brought to the role. However, the decision to darken her skin tone for the character has stirred considerable controversy, particularly among tamil cinema fans. Many viewers felt that while pooja excelled in her role, the deliberate use of makeup to darken her complexion was unnecessary and insensitive, especially in an industry that already struggles with fair-skin bias. This creative choice reignited the debate around colorism and authentic representation in indian cinema.
Social media platforms were quick to reflect the discontent, with netizens questioning director Karthik Subbaraj’s casting decision. They argued that if the role required a darker-skinned woman to stay true to the story’s cultural and regional setting, there are numerous talented actresses with naturally dusky complexions who could have played the role authentically. Instead, casting a fair-skinned actress and artificially altering her appearance through makeup is seen by many as a tone-deaf move that perpetuates outdated and problematic industry practices. This decision not only undermines the talent pool of dark-skinned actresses but also reinforces the idea that dark skin needs to be “acted” rather than lived and represented truthfully.
The controversy around Retro reflects a broader issue in indian cinema—colorism and the lack of meaningful inclusion. While filmmakers may argue artistic freedom, authenticity in casting is becoming increasingly important to audiences who are more socially aware and vocal. This backlash highlights the need for the film industry to evolve in its approach to representation, especially when dealing with issues of identity and appearance. Celebrating diversity means going beyond the superficial and truly embracing actors of all skin tones—not just transforming fair-skinned actors to fit a mold, but giving space to those who live that reality every day.
Social media platforms were quick to reflect the discontent, with netizens questioning director Karthik Subbaraj’s casting decision. They argued that if the role required a darker-skinned woman to stay true to the story’s cultural and regional setting, there are numerous talented actresses with naturally dusky complexions who could have played the role authentically. Instead, casting a fair-skinned actress and artificially altering her appearance through makeup is seen by many as a tone-deaf move that perpetuates outdated and problematic industry practices. This decision not only undermines the talent pool of dark-skinned actresses but also reinforces the idea that dark skin needs to be “acted” rather than lived and represented truthfully.The controversy around Retro reflects a broader issue in indian cinema—colorism and the lack of meaningful inclusion. While filmmakers may argue artistic freedom, authenticity in casting is becoming increasingly important to audiences who are more socially aware and vocal. This backlash highlights the need for the film industry to evolve in its approach to representation, especially when dealing with issues of identity and appearance. Celebrating diversity means going beyond the superficial and truly embracing actors of all skin tones—not just transforming fair-skinned actors to fit a mold, but giving space to those who live that reality every day.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel